22



watched sonatine. first thing that struck me was the way it was shot, something about it was jarring. forgive me for my shaky knowledge of actual cinematic vocabulary. came to notice a few things: a lot of close-up shots, people always occupied the frame (almost always in the dead center, never on those rule of thirds lines). very very few shots with no one in them, even shots of locations felt very up close and personal and populated. that is, in the city. the beach scenes mostly seemed to differ from this, more open air, more freedom. but i guess that there was something binding and constricting about it, ironically. whole movie has this rather nice faded look to it, the whole thing felt very dumbed down in the sort of purgatory

modern hell
way. even out on that beach things felt rather dim. the sparse dialogue is pretty nicely spread out, the characters all have this air of seriousness to them that's broken at all the right moments for comedic or violent ends. movie overall has high aesthetic value. but i'd be lying if i didn't say that some of the plot points flew over my head. nevertheless a good watch, if only just to gawk at some pretty shots. lots of good looking shots in the movie, i neglected to screencap any. the reason it felt jarring at first is because it feels far away from western cinema, shot rather differently. that subsided over the course of it though; i think that the very down to earth, dry, matter-of-fact delivery of mostly everything (plot, dialogue, visuals, characters) in the movie is really interesting, unique as far as i know. makes it all the more cathartic when blood and laughs come spewing out of guns. this movie is to be watched with an exclusively straight face. it's unnerving and melancholic in just the right way.

previous next
home